When deciding whether to perform an Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) in conjunction with an Evaluation and Management (E/M) office visit or as two separate appointments, healthcare providers need to weigh several factors. Each approach has distinct advantages and challenges for both the patient and the provider.
1. Pros of Combining the AWV and E/M Visits in One Appointment
- Convenience for the Patient:
- Combining the AWV and E/M visit into one appointment is convenient for patients, as it requires only one visit instead of two separate ones. This can be particularly beneficial for patients who have long distances to travel or live in rural areas with limited healthcare access.
- Efficient Use of Time:
- For patients, it reduces the need to schedule and attend multiple appointments. This can be a significant time-saver, especially for those with busy schedules or those facing challenges such as transportation issues.
- Financial Efficiency for the Provider:
- The provider can bill both the AWV and the E/M visit during a single appointment. This is possible by using modifier -25, which indicates that a separate and significant service was provided in addition to the primary service.
- Reduced Patient Travel in Adverse Conditions:
- In regions with challenging weather conditions, such as rural areas prone to snowstorms or harsh winters, combining both visits minimizes the need for the patient to make multiple trips. This is especially important if the patient is already scheduled for an AWV and the weather is prohibitive for a return visit shortly after.
Read also: Short leg Splint coding guide for ED Facility coders
Coding guide for Hydration CPT codes 96360 and 96361
Emergency Department Coding Rules (CPT 99281-99285)
Awesome tips for Coding an ED report
How to correctly report the E/M add-on G codes
E/M Coding Guidelines based on TIME
2. Cons of Combining the AWV and E/M Visits in One Appointment
- Increased Visit Length:
- Conducting both the AWV and E/M visits during the same appointment results in a longer session for both the patient and the provider. This can be tiring for patients and may lead to a more rushed experience for the provider, potentially affecting the quality of care.
- Additional Documentation:
- Combining the two visits requires more comprehensive documentation. The provider must ensure that both the AWV and the E/M components are appropriately documented, which can increase the administrative workload.
- Additional Costs for the Patient:
- While the AWV itself typically does not require a copay, the E/M office visit is a billed service and may require the patient to pay a copay. This can lead to confusion for patients, particularly if they do not fully understand the charges or the purpose of the additional visit.
3. Pros of Separating the AWV and E/M Visits
- Clear Separation of Services:
- Conducting the AWV and E/M visits as separate appointments clearly distinguishes the preventive wellness visit from the problem-focused E/M visit. This eliminates any ambiguity about the purpose of each visit and ensures that both services are appropriately classified.
- Reduced Patient Overload:
- A separate visit allows the patient to focus on the specific purpose of each appointment. The AWV can focus purely on preventive care, while the E/M visit can address any medical issues or concerns the patient may have. This helps to prevent information overload, ensuring that the patient receives adequate time and attention for each aspect of care.
- No Copay for the AWV:
- Since the AWV is typically considered a preventive visit, it is generally not subject to a copay, which can be an advantage for the patient. This makes the wellness visit more affordable for those with high-deductible plans or who are concerned about additional out-of-pocket expenses.
Read also:
Essential Tips for Correctly Using Modifier -FS in Split/Shared E/M Visits
A Guide to Choosing the Right E/M Service Level: Time vs. Medical Decision-Making
4. Cons of Separating the AWV and E/M Visits
- Inconvenience for the Patient:
- Requiring two separate visits can be inconvenient for the patient, particularly if they need to travel long distances or face transportation challenges. This may be exacerbated in rural areas or during adverse weather conditions that make travel difficult.
- Limited Access to Providers:
- In areas with limited healthcare provider availability, scheduling two separate appointments may be challenging. Patients might experience delays in securing appointments, potentially leading to longer wait times for care.
- Increased Costs for the Patient:
- Although the AWV may not incur a copay, the separate E/M visit will typically involve additional costs for the patient, which could be a financial burden for some individuals.
Conclusion:
The decision to combine or separate the AWV and E/M visits depends on several factors, including patient convenience, provider availability, and financial considerations. Combining the two visits can streamline care and reduce patient travel, but it may also result in longer visits, more paperwork, and additional costs for the patient. On the other hand, separating the visits offers clearer distinctions between preventive and problem-focused care, but it may impose logistical and financial challenges. Each healthcare provider must evaluate these factors based on their practice and patient population to determine the most appropriate approach.